Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts

Monday, April 3, 2017

President Trump Outsmarts Media and Democrats!

    


Has President Trump been vindicated for his claims of "wiretapping?' I think so. I also think even more proof will come out very soon. What I want to hear, if or when that happens is an apology from every person in the media who excoriated President Trump over his accusations.

The very liberal Bloomberg News released the following story today:

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-

Even Eli Lake in his story said, " The ranking Democrat on the committee Nunes chairs, Representative Adam Schiff, viewed these reports on Friday. In comments to the press over the weekend he declined to discuss the contents of these reports, but also said it was highly unusual for the reports to be shown only to Nunes and not himself and other members of the committee.
Indeed, much about this is highly unusual: if not how the surveillance was collected, then certainly how and why it was disseminated."

You think Eli?

We now know Susan Rice was one of Obama's Senior people involved. There will be others.

President Trump could have released this information much sooner. Instead he sat on it while the MSM and the Democrats railed on. Now he has allowed them to destroy what little credibility they had left. Now they have to wonder what else does he know, and wait for the other shoe to drop. It was a stroke of genius.

Adam Schiff's attitude sure has changed.

No wonder President Obama has kept quiet on this. This will end up going all the way to the top.


Saturday, April 1, 2017

A Victim of the War on Opioids

    



I am a victim of the war on opioid addiction. Among other health issues, I live with Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. On the McGill Pain Index it is rated as the number one most painful of all chronic pain diseases. For 17 of the past 20 years I have been going to pain management clinics.

During those 17 years I have had a minimum of 6 random drug screens a year. Most years more than 6, never less than 6. I have never failed a drug test. Never. Every since Obamacare started I have dealt with a steady decrease in the amount and or type of pain medication I am allowed. All while the cost has gone up.

When I was first diagnosed I was fussed at by my Dr. for not using all the opioids I was prescribed and told the stress of living with such pain would eventually wear my heart out. I was also told I would get  to the point it wouldn't be worth getting out of bed to do things. It just wouldn't be worth the suffering I would go through the next few days after having a fairly active day. One of my Drs. even told me I was the strongest man he had ever met, but I would get to that point.

Since 2010, my pain medicine has been reduced from 3- 80 mg OxyContin's, 4- 2mg Diluaded's, and 4 -10 mg Valiums a day to now 3 Percocet's a day and 3 - Baclofins The pain hasn't changed. The disease hasn't changed. My cost has changed. It has gone up! My quality of life has changed. It has gone down. Way down. I had to cancel my birthday party with just family this year because I absolutely couldn't get out of bed to be with my small family.

My heart is showing the effects of living with the stress. I have more days I have to just lay around than I ever have. I am not saying this to get sympathy from anyone, just to show there are unintended consequences from this war on opioid addiction.

This "war" will drive more people who have true needs to seek alternative sources for pain control which will turn them into criminals. It will also expose them to drugs with no quality control which will lead to more overdoses. Their only other option will be to do as I do and spend more and more time suffering alone in their bedrooms. Putting those who love them through sheer hell on earth as they watch them just waste away.

I used to work narcotics as a Police Officer. I have seen what narcotic abuse causes. The lives ruined. I have seen the damage done from Narcotics abuse in people I truly care for. A friend of mine who was living in severe pain from a back injury died with a heroin needle in his arm 34 years ago. He wasn't chasing a high, he was chasing pain relief. I understand the need to do something. Something has to be done. There has to be a way to do something about addiction without making those of us who have a true, legitimate medical need pay the price, physically, medically, financially, and emotionally.

I am not smart enough to know what the answer is, however I know the answer is not to cut my life short because of the stress put on my heart from living with such intense pain. The answer is not to sentence me to a life of misery waiting around for my heart to wear out because of the pain and lack of activity.

When President Obama got Obamacare passed, and people begin to see a lot of Americans were being hurt by Obamacare I watched as he said in an interview, "anytime we have sweeping changes like this there will be winners and losers. Some will be hurt by Obamacare, they just have to understand its for the greater good." I and my family were hurt by Obamacare. Bad. Now I hear the same thing about the war on Opioid Addiction.

My challenge to President Trump and Governor Christie, find an answer that helps addicts, their families and friends that doesn't hurt those of us who have legitimate needs.

The Hypocrisy of Susan Rice

    




What we don't need is someone who has been as complicit in lying to the American people as Susan Rice has lecturing anyone on the need to tell the truth. Susan's hypocrisy was on full display in her recent op-ed in The Washington Post. Susan, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Excerpts from her op-ed are in red.


Last week, the British intelligence agency GCHQ took the rare step of debunking as “utterly ridiculous” the Trump administration’s insinuation that Britain spied on Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign. On Monday, FBI Director James B. Comey testified plainly that “I have no information that supports” President Trump’s accusations that his predecessor ordered the “wires tapped” at Trump Tower. These false statements from the White House are part of a disturbing pattern of behavior that poses real and potentially profound dangers to U.S. national security.
The foundation of the United States’ unrivaled global leadership rests only in part on our military might, the strength of our economy and the power of our ideals. It is also grounded in the perception that the United States is steady, rational and fact-based. To lead effectively, the United States must maintain respect and trust. So, when a White House deliberately dissembles and serially contorts the facts, its actions pose a serious risk to America’s global leadership, among friends and adversaries alike.

Really Susan? Did you really go there? You who lied to not just American citizens about Benghazi being about a YouTube Video, but also lied to our allies? You who worked for the first Administration who leaked that our strongest ally in the Middle East, Israel, does in fact have nuclear weapons. You who worked for the Administration who was caught spying on the leaders of our allies?

You who worked for the Administration who admitted in an interview with The New York Times they manipulated the press and lied to our allies especially Israel, to get their "deal" with Iran? You who worked for the Administration that issued the "red line warning" to Syria then did nothing when they crossed it. You don't think that damaged our standing in the world?

Who can forget Time Magazine's Lie of the Year? Don't you remember your boss, President Obama winning it for, "If you like your Dr. you can keep your Dr., if you like your Insurance you can keep your Insurance." Who can forget Jonathan Gruber admitting the intentional lies and misinformation used to pass Obamacare?

You worked for an Administration who has been caught lying to the American people and our allies more than any Administration in my memory. You participated in many of those lies. How do you think our Allies in Europe felt when they heard your boss caught on a "hot mike" saying "tell Valdimer  I will have more flexibility after my election." Do you really think that didn't damage our credibility with our allies?

Susan for the reasons listed above, among others, you have earned our Hypocrite of the Week award. 

If you want to read the entire op-ed you can read it here:

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/susan-rice-when-the-white-house-twists-the-truth-we-are-all-less-safe/2017/03/21/f7cdef86-0e45-11e7-9d5a-a83e627dc120_story.html?utm_term=.addd314c5d69  

Friday, March 17, 2017

It All Makes Sense Now, Obama Iran, and ISIS

    



February 3, 2015, ISIS burned Jordanian Military Pilot Moaz al-Kasasbeh to death. The video ISIS released showed him standing chained in a steel cage as the flames engulfed him. It was a video that shocked the world. Jordan's King Abdullah was actually in the United States at the time and cut his visit short to return to Jordan.

It wasn't long however before the King was back in the United States asking for ammunition, surveillance drones, as well as bombs and missiles for Jordan's planes. Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia were preparing to send in their military to take ISIS out. Permanently.  

They were turned down by the Obama Administration. Think about this. You had Sunni Muslim countries willing and able to go into Iraq and Syria and take out the predominantly Sunni Muslim ISIS. The Saudi's and other Gulf States were prepared to fund the military operation.  

I and other conservative commentators at the time questioned the decision by the Obama Administration to not only refuse to support their efforts, but also pressure them to stay out of it. It simply didn't make sense. Think of how many lives would have been saved had they been allowed to take ISIS out at that time. How many terror attacks across the world that may have been prevented.

I vividly remember writing an article questioning the decision by Obama and trying to come up with a legitimate reason why? I am pretty sure I know the reason now. Obama's failed Iranian Nuclear Deal. It is the only thing that makes sense. Especially when you see the lengths Ben Rhodes admitted in The New York Times he went too in order to manipulate and deceive the Press and the American People to get this "deal" done.

Had the Obama Administration allowed and supported the Sunni Muslim countries military to go in and take out ISIS there is no way Obama could get his horrible deal. The Iranian Mullahs would have been furious. Of course that is nothing new. They are always furious about something.

I hate to admit it but I didn't think of this while it was going on in early 2015. I wondered why the MSM was not asking the Obama Administration why they wouldn't support Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in their willingness to destroy ISIS, but I must confess the Iranian "deal" never crossed my mind. Even when I read Ben Rhodes bragging in The New York Times it never crossed my mind. I even speculated it may be Valerie Jarrett's influence.

It wasn't until Prince Faisal Bin Farhan Al Saud, an advisor to Deputy Crown Prince Salman al Saud of Saudi Arabia, appeared with Bret Baier for an interview to discuss the Deputy Crown Prince Salman’s meeting with President Trump.

Farhan said that the Crown Prince was “keen to come and meet President Trump as early as possible” to “reinvigorate their strategic, longstanding partnership” of fifty years.
Baier asked him about paying their fair share of the cost of defeating ISIS and setting up safe zones in Syria as Trump has mentioned.

The next thing Farhan said is quite disturbing. They’re “more than ready to cooperate with the United States on countering ISIS in Syria and Iraq, across the region, not just financially but the Saudi government offered during the Obama administration’s time to send its troops into Syria to fight ISIS, that was not met with enthusiasm by the Obama administration.”

It was then it all clicked. It was more important to President Obama to make this terrible deal with Iran than to once and for all destroy the savages of ISIS. It was more important for his legacy. He would have got very little credit for Muslim countries destroying ISIS, but all the credit for the Iranian "deal." Or in my opinion, all the blame for the deal.

I encourage everyone, Conservative or Liberal to watch and listen carefully to the entire interview.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Brett+Baier+interview+with+Saudi+Prince&view=detail&mid=C99689AD841B315D51CEC99689AD841B315D51CE&FORM=VIRE

Monday, March 6, 2017

Was The Obama Administration Spying on Trump?

    


I don't have any proof to support or deny the claim. I think to begin to answer that we should look at the history of the Obama Administration. We have to remember we are talking about an Administration who used the IRS to target Conservative groups. Spied on people in the media, and members of Congress. For even the most loyal Obama supporters to deny this could happen amazes me. A little history:

WASHINGTON — In an extraordinary public accusation, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee declared on Tuesday that the CIA interfered with and then tried to intimidate a congressional investigation into the agency’s possible use of torture in terror probes during the Bush administration.
The CIA clandestinely removed documents and searched a computer network set up for lawmakers, said Sen. Dianne Feinstein in a long and biting speech on the Senate floor. In an escalating dispute with an agency she has long supported, she said the CIA may well have violated criminal laws and the U.S. Constitution.

http://nypost.com/2014/03/11/sen-feinstein-claims-cia-spied-on-congress/

A Fox News correspondent was accused in a Justice Department affidavit of being a possible criminal "co-conspirator" for his alleged role in publishing sensitive security information -- in a leak case that takes the highly unusual step of claiming a journalist broke the law.  
According to court documents, the Justice Department obtained a portfolio of information about Fox News' James Rosen's conversations and visits to the State Department. This included a search warrant for his personal emails.
The effort follows that by the department to secretly obtain two months of phone records from Associated Press journalists as part of a separate leak probe. The department in this case, though, went a step further -- as an FBI agent claimed there's evidence the Fox News correspondent broke the law, "at the very least, either as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator."
Michael Clemente, Fox News' executive vice president of news, defended Rosen in a statement issued Monday afternoon.
"We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally defend his right to operate as a member of what up until now has always been a free press."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/20/justice-department-obtained-records-fox-news-journalist.html

May 14, 2013 — The Society of Environmental Journalists strongly condemns the Department of Justice’s overly broad investigation of the Associated Press’ newsgathering operations as an infringement of First Amendment press freedoms.
By secretly seizing telephone records for more than 20 phone lines used by AP journalists and offices, including cell and home phone lines, DOJ has unjustifiably targeted facilities and phones used by more than 100 journalists, and obtained the names of sources and confidential information about the newsgathering operations.
The Obama administration has been aggressive in seeking to stop leaks and control the flow of information. Its investigation into a leak that led to stories about a failed terrorist plot to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day 2011 was known from public testimony by administration officials. But the government’s collection of information from AP phone lines in New York, Washington, Hartford, Conn., and the AP’s main House of Representatives Press Gallery number far exceeded the scope of any justifiable investigation.
 The Associated Press says it regards the Justice Department’s secret investigation as a serious interference with its constitutional rights to gather and report the news, and SEJ agrees.  As requested by the AP, DOJ should fully explain its actions, return all records of conversations and calls to the AP and destroy all copies of those call records.
Beth Parke
Executive Director
Society of Environmental Journalists
Joseph A. Davis
Director, FOI WatchDog Project
Society of Environmental Journalists
See also:

http://www.sej.org/sej-condemns-doj-ap-phone-records-grab

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/govt-obtains-wide-ap-phone-records-probe

http://www.ap.org/Images/Letter-to-Eric-Holder_tcm28-12896.pdf

So we have an Administration who has demonstrated a willingness to spy on sitting members of Congress, and members of the press. Do you think they would be reluctant to spy on Donald Trump?

Then look at the denials from the Obama Administration Officials. They have not denied President Trump was spied on. They have only denied President Obama ordered it.

    

Then there is this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0&feature=share

I can't say beyond a shadow of a doubt if the spying occurred or not. What I can say is looking at the history of the Obama Administration, and what we do know,any reasonably objective person should at least admit there is a good chance it happened.

The American people deserve to know the truth. If it is true this would be much bigger than Watergate, Monicagate, or the Iran/Contra affair.




Saturday, March 4, 2017

It Is Time to Turn The DOJ Loose

    
The morning after the election I wrote President Trump shouldn't continue the investigation of Hillary, Bill, the Clinton Foundation etc. That he should let the country heal from a brutal, divisive campaign. I was wrong.

I had already planned this article before the news broke this morning of the previous Administration tapping then Candidate Trump's phones and internet. That news makes it more imperative President Trump, and Attorney General Sessions turn loyal DOJ lawyers and investigators loose.

They should investigate Hillary and Bill's ties to Russia. Tom Perez's decision to drop charges against the New Black Panthers. The IRS targeting of Conservative Organizations. The back room deals on Iran. Was it illegal to pay Iran the money in cash? It appears it was. Even Obama's own Justice Department had a problem with it.

They should investigate the ethics charges against Harry Reid that were brought because of he and his son's business dealings. U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum, won the first phase construction contract for California’s high-speed rail system. Is there corruption there?

http://calwatchdog.com/2013/04/26/se-diane-feinsteins-husband-wins-ca-rail-contract/

Eric Holder should be investigated for perjury to Congress among other things.

President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Valerie Jarret, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, etc. have declared war on President Trump. As such they have declared war on America.

It is time for President Trump and his Cabinet to dismiss any Obama holdovers and start fighting fire with fire. If it means prison time for any of the above mentioned people. If they are legitimately investigated, tried and convicted so be it. Investigate and let the chips fall where they may.

This is war. It's war on the Trump Administration. America and her citizens. It is time to fight to win,

Friday, March 3, 2017

The Hypocrisy About Russia is Astounding

    


Remember this:
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Obama+Tell+Vladimir+I%27ll+Have+more+flexabilty&&view=detail &mid=18AD7EB17C4099EE236E18AD7EB17C4099EE236E&rvsmid=2470B88B138A20A4129A2470B88B138A20A4129A&fsscr=0&FORM=VDQVAP

President Obama told outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have "more flexibility" after the November election to take on the sticky issue of building a missile defense system in Europe.
Obama tells Medvedev: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."
Medvedev replied: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir." The Vladimir, Medvedev refers to, is presumably incoming Russian president Vladimir Putin.

This is real evidence of real collusion with Putin and Russia. Not speculation. Not a conspiracy theory. Video and Audio evidence.

Remember all the outrage from the Democratic Party? Remember them calling for President Obama to recuse himself from any dealings with Russia? Remember them calling for his resignation? Remember the MSM coming out with calls of Conspiracy? No neither do I.

What about Hillary Clinton and Russia? Remember this article from that "Right Wing Conspiracy Newspaper, The New York Times"?

Bill Clinton earned a $500,000.00 speaking fee. The Clinton Foundation earned Millions. America lost 20% of its Uranium Assets to the Russians. Did the Democrats ask for an independent investigation? Did they ask for Hillary to be prosecuted? Did they call for her impeachment? Nope. They nominated her as the Democratic nominee for President of The United States.

 Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill has tweeted in the past about meetings and phone calls she has had with Russia’s ambassador, despite claiming on Thursday that she has never met with or talked to the diplomat.

Senator McCaskill, remember we have this thing called the internet. We have search engines. We don't have to rely on liberal fact checking organizations. We can do our on fact checking. You are a hypocrite.

This appears to be nothing more than a concentrated effort by the Democrats to destroy the Trump Presidency before it even gets started. Stop the games. Get to work!

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Political Theater at the DNC



Yesterday morning I watched an interview with David Webb on Fox and Friends weekend. I think David proved yet again yesterday that he is a very intelligent commentator. In the interview he said the "fix" was in. Tom Perez would be the new DNC Chair. He said that was who the Clinton Team and The Obama team both wanted.

I have learned better than to discount anything David says. In my opinion David was 100% correct. Perez came out of no where to win the vote. For any of us who follow politics closely, it appeared Keith Ellison had it won.

It must have appeared that way to the progressive wing also. They were not happy when the results were announced.

If anyone thinks the "fix" wasn't in all they have to do is look what both Perez and Ellison did and said immediately after the results were announced. After taking over, Perez moved to name Ellison his deputy chairman, aiming to unify a divided party.

"When we have these conversations, sometimes spirited, sometimes difficult, that's not a sign of weakness, that's a sign of strength as a party and that's what were going to keep doing,” Perez said.

“If you came here supporting me, wearing a Keith t-shirt, or any t-shirt, I’m asking you to give everything you’ve got to support Chairman Perez,” said Ellison, accepting the role. “You love this country, you love all the people in it, you care about each and every one of them, urban, rural, suburban, all cultures, all faiths, everybody, and they are in need of your help. And if we waste even a moment going at it over who supported who, we are not going to be standing up for those people. We don’t have the luxury, folks, to walk out of this room divided."

When Perez won, Ellison backers erupted in anger, chanting “Party of the people, not big money!”

Both Perez and Ellison sought to present themselves as unity candidates, but Perez was widely seen as the candidate representing the Obama-Clinton wing of the party, and Ellison as the candidate of the Bernie Sanders wing.

Former President Barack Obama released a statement on the results.

"What unites our party is a belief in opportunity – the idea that however you started out, whatever you look like, or whomever you love, America is the place where you can make it if you try," he said. "I know that Tom Perez will unite us under that banner of opportunity, and lay the groundwork for a new generation of Democratic leadership for this big, bold, inclusive, dynamic America we love so much."

Make no mistake, David Webb was correct. The "fix" was in!

Friday, February 17, 2017

President Trump's Press Conference

    


I'm very glad I didn't write this article yesterday after the press conference as I started to. It was better I was able to watch it again from  2:45 to 4:00 this morning and see the reactions from the media.

After watching the 77 minute press conference for the second time I am more impressed than I was immediately after. To be honest there were a couple of issues I had. I didn't like his comment about his Electoral College Victory. I thought he was too vague on his answer about his  about his campaign talking to the Russians.

I think it is hilarious the MSM is bashing him for saying he inherited a mess. Good Lord! How many times did we hear President Obama say the same thing over the past 8 years with no fallout from the MSM? If anything shows how biased the MSM is that should. Even President Trump's detractors have to see that.

I also think its funny they are calling him a liar for his comment on the Electoral College win. To be fair, it wasn't true and they should call him on it. The problem I have is they didn't call President Obama out for his serial lying. After watching it in its entirety 2 times, if I were a Teacher grading it, I would give The President a B plus, an A plus had he answered the Russian question better and left out the Electoral College comment. I give the MSM a F.

George Stephanopoulos - "What a remarkable window into the state of mind of the President of the United States right there....lashed out at the press, made it very clear he thinks the press is dishonest....never seen anything like that.”

Special correspondent Matthew Dowd agreed: “No, that was the most amazing press conference by a president I have ever seen and I've been watching it since the mid-70s. And I don't mean amazing in great, I mean amazing in spectacular insight into Donald Trump and his state of mind today.” The political analyst noted how presidents usually “are empowered and get bigger” after they take office, but argued that Trump “looked smaller and actually more insecure in his position...”

Dowd then compared the President to a paranoid and delusional movie character: “...it was reminiscent of Captain Queeg in a Caine Mutiny and somebody saying, ‘I’m going to search for their strawberries.’ He's in full-on conflict with the intelligence community and he’s in full-on conflict with the media.”
“When a U.S. Naval captain shows signs of mental instability that jeopardizes the ship, the first officer relieves him of command and faces court martial for mutiny.”

White House correspondent Cecilia Vega chimed in:
I mean, just a couple of the words that I jotted down over the course of the last hour and a half, “bizarre,” “contentious,” if we’re looking – we’re getting insight into the mind of our president, that he is just obsessed with coverage. He's clearly watching television at all hours, talking about late-night programming on cable. He shouted down reporters, he told people to sit down. It seemed as if this is something he had been wanting to do, to get off of his chest for the last few weeks...

Later in coverage, Stephanopoulos wondered: “...it's clearly clear that the President likes having the press as a foil, we see that right there. It worked for him in the campaign, does it work as president?” Dowd replied: “...he walked in there with a hornet's nest of the press. What he did coming out of there was poke it even more. And so, I don’t think he calmed that media down...He actually stirred it up more. So there's going to be a hundred more stories that are going to come out of this.”

Chuck Todd and the other journalists at NBC are openly fuming that Donald Trump continues to call out the biased coverage of his administration. During Thursday’s press conference, an angry Todd tweeted, “This not a laughing matter.  I'm sorry, delegitimizing the press is un-American.” 
He later whined, “Press bashing may feel good to folks but when it's done by people in power, it's corrosive. Take off your partisan hats for a second.” During live coverage, Lester Holt chided, “It was contentious. It was ugly at moments and we haven't seen anything like it.” 

Talking to Holt, Todd declared, “Look, this is a president that appears to be in a bunker mentality right now, whatever that is.” 
A lot of this press conference had to do with the President airing grievances about the press and we've got to remember what this is. It's a political tactic. It's one that's a familar one, but he is going at it in a way we haven't seen a president do since Nixon and those early ‘70s.

After a hectic Thursday of media meltdowns reacting to President Trump’s press conference, the lunacy was still flowing on MSNBC’s Hardball. In less than 20 minutes, host Chris Matthews compared a “manic” Trump to Jack Nicholson from A Few Good Men and Alger Hiss attempting to wiggle his way out of being deemed a Soviet spy.
Those comparisons weren’t without plenty of whining from the MSNBC pundit. Speaking to his first panel of the night, Matthews lamented that he’s attacking the whole media and “not...a reporter for making a mistake” because “[e]verybody makes mistakes and there are no angels in the press” or “devils.”
Matthew:
There’s just people doing their jobs under the First Amendment. What is he up to? Why is he attacking all media, all the time except his favs, like Fox & Friends and Krauthammer — the neocon writer. He’s a smart guy. He only picks out those few that he thinks have been selling him lately.
New York Times reporter Yamiche Alcindor agreed, fretting that “[t]his is really about delegitimizing the press and I think a lot of it has to do with the idea that, later on, if we uncover something like — maybe more that there is more to the Russia story.”

In a sign that media won’t be changing their ways, Alcindor admitted that Trump’s attacks on the media make the industry “want[ing] to dig even deeper.”
Ignoring the fact that Barack Obama barely (if ever) accepted responsibility whenever he didn’t get his way, Politico’s Eli Stokols complained: “Well, I mean, he's passing the buck. He takes no responsibility. He says we inherited all of this.”
Out of the blue, Matthews exclaimed seconds later: “It seems like he’s against the idea of reporting!”
The kooky was just getting started as Matthews went on to invoke Nicholson’s role as Col. Nathan R. Jessup in 1992's A Few Good Men and described Trump as “manic” in his behavior:
I don’t know if it — not quite manic. I’m not going to go that far, but there was sort of an element of, you know, Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men — like, you know: “You can't handle the truth.” And he comes out and it’s almost — id is showing. You know, a lot of id. A lot of just psychic, ‘this is what I can't sleep at night about. This is what bugging me.’ It was very — there was no BS to it tonight. He honestly, obviously believes everything he said today — the way he said it — it was so manic or almost manic.
Stokols agreed:
He talked about the tone. He was kind of admonishing the media. ‘You know, your tone is negative.’ And there’s something in that. I mean, what he does with his tone, is he — you know — sounds like a guidance counselor....he’s sort of takes the edge off a little bit about what he is saying so he doesn't sound like Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men. And in so doing, you don’t notice the authoritarianism[.]



Thursday, February 16, 2017

Obamacare, Political Minefield

    

Full disclosure, I despise "Obamacare."  I want it gone. It has been absolutely horrible for me and for my family. In the past week alone, I had two new prescriptions, not to replace medicines I am already on, but add to what I am already on. One was over $300.00, one was $178.00 per month. Needless to say I didn't get either filled. Between Jean and I our pharmacy costs are already outrageous without adding an additional $480.00 per month.

In addition Jean had a procedure done last week that before Obamacare was a $45.00 copay, now $250.00. My 84 year old Dad is on 3 different monthly prescriptions that run from $175.00 to $251.00 each per month plus his other prescriptions. He and Mom have to decide every month which Dr. they can visit and which medicine can they purchase.

I wrote all that simply too show I despise Obamacare as much as many of you who will be upset with me for what I am about to write.

Conservatives and Republicans must be very careful with repealing Obamacare. As much as I despise it and want it gone we need to remember there is a lot of political risk in moving too quickly. As much as I personally would prefer a quick and complete repeal, that may be political suicide.

In my opinion, it would be much better to do it in pieces. As they repeal a section replace that section. Take the most unpopular, unfair parts first. There are so many things that could be done immediately without a total and immediate repeal, that could lower costs and increase coverage. Start with those.

Anytime the Government makes a wholesale change like when the ACA was passed, there are winners and losers. If the Republicans repeal and replace all at once, those who are the losers in the process will take it out them in 2018. Just as we did on the Democrats because of Obamacare. Take it slow and cautiously. Do it in stages. See what the unintentional consequences are before moving on.

Otherwise risk losing the Senate and possibly the House.  

Monday, February 13, 2017

What The MSM Won't Tell You About The Immigration Raids

    

The MSM is blaming President Trump for the recent Immigration "raids" in 6 states. Thank goodness for the Internet. How quickly the liberal press forget we can be our own fact checkers. The Main Stream Media is playing a very dangerous game. By not reporting the true facts in an attempt to push their agenda, the MSM is sparking outrage that will result in violence.

What we know so far:
In Southern California, 161 were arrested. Of that 150 were scheduled to be picked up and deported before President Trump was sworn in. Of that 150, 75% were convicted of felonies or serious misdemeanors. The so called "raids" were planned 2-3 months ahead of time, under the administration of President Obama.
Of the remaining 11who were picked up, only 5 would not have been picked up under the Obama Administration rules. 5 out of 161!
We also know there was a similar "raid" in mid summer. There were four differences in that raid.
1.  It was under the Obama Administration.
2.  Very little if any news coverage.
3.  More arrests were made.
4.  No mass protests.

Why the difference? I think it is simply because President Obama was loved by the majority of the media, President Trump, despised by the majority of the media. The media and Immigration Rights groups have been whipping up mass hysteria and rage over this routine ICE action. Nothing good can come from that. Nothing.

Unlike many of my Conservative Peers, I have long advocated for  common sense, compassionate Immigration Reform. Not Amnesty, but a pathway to a legal status for those illegal Immigrants, who have been here for years and been an asset to their communities and our country.

The liberal MSM, Liberal Sites like the Huffington Post, Think Progress, Immigration Rights Groups and Progressive Politicians acting in this manner make the likelihood of reasonable Immigration Reform much more difficult to achieve.

When I read something like this from The Huffington Post:

Undocumented Immigrants Arrested Nationwide, Stoking Fears Of Trump’s ‘Deportation Force’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-immigration-raids-deportation_us_589e1eb0e4b094a129eb03b0

It simply makes me want to rethink my position on Immigration Reform. When I hear Illegal Immigrants on TV demanding the right to stay in this country, or holding up signs saying "This is my Country too."  When I see Illegal Immigrants and their supporters protesting, blocking traffic etc. it makes me want to rethink. When I see progressive politicians having rallies and advocating criminal activity, it makes me want to rethink.

All theses actions are doing is splitting our country even more and making the likelihood of meaningful reform even less.










Friday, February 3, 2017

Why Is Make America Great Again Considered Racist?


    






When I wrote my book, "We Owe it to Our Children: Time to Take Back Our Country," I had to set up a separate email account just for the hate mail. I was accused of being a racist simply over the title from many more people than there were copies sold of the book.

    




https://www.amazon.com/We-Owe-our-Children-Country/dp/0692562109/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

When Donald Trump began using the "Make America Great Again" slogan he was immediately branded a racist.

I'm not going to lie to you and say I have never done or said anything that was racist. I'm not proud of it but I have. I'm human. I imagine anyone who reads this has. No matter what race you are, I imagine you can think of something you have said or done that is racist. We are all humans with human weakness's.

I am just having a hard time seeing how that book title, or campaign slogan can be considered racist. It doesn't mean we want to return to slavery or Jim Crow laws. It means we long for a time when parents could allow their children go out and play anywhere in the neighborhood without fear no matter the race.

How is it racist to want to return America to that beacon on the hill President Reagan spoke of? Why is it racist to oppose the policies of Barack Obama, not because he is half black and half white, but because you feel his policies were detrimental to our country. If in your heart you believed that but didn't speak out because he is half black would that in itself not be a form of racism? 

I did not vote for President Obama either time. It had absolutely nothing to do with his race. In the first election one of the main reasons he didn't get my vote was his comment about bitter people clinging to their Bibles and guns. Still I remember so well watching his first Inauguration. I was so proud of our country. I feared his policies but was hopeful he could bring everyone together.

I remember listening to Juan Williams describing his feelings as a black man and it tugged at my heart. I actually had to wipe tears from my face. As we got away from his glowing rhetoric on the campaign trail, to actually governing, I came to the unfortunate conclusion that my hope of him bringing everyone together wasn't meant to be.

If I was a racist, I wouldn't have donated money I truly don't have to Col. Allen West's last Congressional campaign. I wouldn't have asked him to consider a run for President which I did. I wouldn't have supported Dr. Ben Carson, Herman Caine, Mia Love, Senator Tim Scott, Dr. Thomas Sowell, Sheriff David Clarke and so many other African Americans who represent my same philosophical and or Religious beliefs.  It has nothing to do with race, sex, creed or color. Others include: Condoleezza Rice, Alan Keyes, Larry Elder, Judge Clarence Thomas, Tony Dungy, Michael Steele, Dr. Alveda King, Dr. Carol Swain, Charles Payne, Erik Rush, Deneen Borella, Harris Faulkner, and Kevin Jackson.

I would support any of those for political office. Not because they are African Americans. Because they reflect my values. Period.

I have been told over and over as a white man I can't understand what it is like to be a minority in this country. They are right. Neither can I understand the discrimination my Irish Ancestors felt when they first came to this country and the Irish were treated so badly. Nor how my American Indian Ancestors felt, or once my Irish Ancestors married American Indians how their children felt being called "Black Irish" and being discriminated against.

This is what I do know. Wanting to return to a time when kids weren't killing kids; when kids and young adults weren't dying in alarming rates of drug overdoses; when families stayed together and raised their children; when we had daily prayers to start our day in school; when the American Flag was in our classroom and we said The Pledge of Allegiance every morning; these things aren't racist. They are simply wanting what is best for our children of all races. We need to study and understand our history, both the good and the bad, so we don't make the same mistakes. So we understand the sacrifices so many have made to make this the greatest country in history, but we don't need to live in the past.

It's time to come together before it takes another tragedy to bring us together.