It All Makes Sense Now, Obama Iran, and ISIS

    

February 3, 2015, ISIS burned Jordanian Military Pilot Moaz al-Kasasbeh to death. The video ISIS released showed him standing chained in a steel cage as the flames engulfed him. It was a video that shocked the world. Jordan's King Abdullah was actually in the United States at the time and cut his visit short to return to Jordan.

It wasn't long however before the King was back in the United States asking for ammunition, surveillance drones, as well as bombs and missiles for Jordan's planes. Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia were preparing to send in their military to take ISIS out. Permanently.  

They were turned down by the Obama Administration. Think about this. You had Sunni Muslim countries willing and able to go into Iraq and Syria and take out the predominantly Sunni Muslim ISIS. The Saudi's and other Gulf States were prepared to fund the military operation.  

I and other conservative commentators at the time questioned the decision by the Obama Administration to not only refuse to support their efforts, but also pressure them to stay out of it. It simply didn't make sense. Think of how many lives would have been saved had they been allowed to take ISIS out at that time. How many terror attacks across the world that may have been prevented.

I vividly remember writing an article questioning the decision by Obama and trying to come up with a legitimate reason why? I am pretty sure I know the reason now. Obama's failed Iranian Nuclear Deal. It is the only thing that makes sense. Especially when you see the lengths Ben Rhodes admitted in The New York Times he went too in order to manipulate and deceive the Press and the American People to get this "deal" done.

Had the Obama Administration allowed and supported the Sunni Muslim countries military to go in and take out ISIS there is no way Obama could get his horrible deal. The Iranian Mullahs would have been furious. Of course that is nothing new. They are always furious about something.

I hate to admit it but I didn't think of this while it was going on in early 2015. I wondered why the MSM was not asking the Obama Administration why they wouldn't support Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia in their willingness to destroy ISIS, but I must confess the Iranian "deal" never crossed my mind. Even when I read Ben Rhodes bragging in The New York Times it never crossed my mind. I even speculated it may be Valerie Jarrett's influence.

It wasn't until Prince Faisal Bin Farhan Al Saud, an advisor to Deputy Crown Prince Salman al Saud of Saudi Arabia, appeared with Bret Baier for an interview to discuss the Deputy Crown Prince Salman’s meeting with President Trump.

Farhan said that the Crown Prince was “keen to come and meet President Trump as early as possible” to “reinvigorate their strategic, longstanding partnership” of fifty years.
Baier asked him about paying their fair share of the cost of defeating ISIS and setting up safe zones in Syria as Trump has mentioned.

The next thing Farhan said is quite disturbing. They’re “more than ready to cooperate with the United States on countering ISIS in Syria and Iraq, across the region, not just financially but the Saudi government offered during the Obama administration’s time to send its troops into Syria to fight ISIS, that was not met with enthusiasm by the Obama administration.”

It was then it all clicked. It was more important to President Obama to make this terrible deal with Iran than to once and for all destroy the savages of ISIS. It was more important for his legacy. He would have got very little credit for Muslim countries destroying ISIS, but all the credit for the Iranian "deal." Or in my opinion, all the blame for the deal.

I encourage everyone, Conservative or Liberal to watch and listen carefully to the entire interview.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Brett+Baier+interview+with+Saudi+Prince&view=detail&mid=C99689AD841B315D51CEC99689AD841B315D51CE&FORM=VIRE